So there was a chat on the Washington Post website today about Raising an Autistic Child (here's the
LINK, although I don't know how long it stays at that address, so can't vouch it'll still be there when you click...), and I'm a little...bothered...by it.
I guess I just don't see how anyone can be so SURE that because of the choices they made as parents, their child has "recovered". We don't know anything about causes, and what works on one autistic child doesn't work on another, and there are things we as parents simply have no control over.
This woman went into bankruptcy, gave up her job and future retirement security, spent years fighting for specific therapies - and praise be, her son is doing very well. But I feel sure that another parent, doing the same things, may not have seen those results. And yet another, doing something completely different, would have had similar "recovery".
I think her hard work and devotion should be applauded. No doubt.
But I also think it's a slippery slope. If a parent can make the "right" choices for their autistic child to get X results, then it's easy to flip it that if a child is not making such progress, then the parents must be doing something wrong. And with a disorder as complicated and varied as autism, with so many unknowns...well, that's an unfair burden on an already stressful situation.
Here's what we know:
1. Autism happens.
2. Early indentification and early intervention leads to better functioning later in life in general (but not with every child).
That's it. All these myriads of therapies and treatments? Pretty much still in the rhelm of speculation. It's better to do something than nothing, but the jury's still out on what that something should optimally be.
So we, as parents, do our best. We weigh cost, and what other people have seen, and how our child responds to things, and make choices. That's all we can do.